Dark Plasma Hypothesis
Abstract
Big Bang Nucleosynthesis hypothesis is based on enormous pressure cause the heat and burst of subatomic particles turned out to hydrogen and helium which are the very first atoms in the process. Stellar nucleosynthesis (Hydrogen & Helium Fusions) created heavier atoms and elements until 1st generation star formation and even S,R Processes.
However the missing part of the BB Hypothesis is the root cause of the pressure.
Where did the pressure come from? Or How pressure happened?
I think Dark Plasma Hypothesis will give some light on the root cause of pressure and the circle of universal dynamics.
Hypothesis
We know today, 4% are known matter and particles and 96% of universe is unknown Dark Energy and Dark Matter. I will ignore Dark Matter for now and focus on Dark Energy. All energy forms as far as We know should have a source in itself OR outer source. But we don't know what dark energy is! To able to make easier to be understand of the model than I will take it as a plasma in this hypothesis and call the Dark Energy as "Dark Plasma" (in short DP).
As we know all isotopes has its own stable state. If we take Dark Plasma's stable state is to be planck length then it will incline back to its first status which was the first state of BB. However BB caused to enlarge the DP. (Please think DP as a stretched fabric or stretch liquid which covers all matter OR all particles swim inside of it).
I will assume that Dark Plasma caused the pressure on 4% of particles in planck length before Big Bang. This pressure caused the enormous heat and burst. I will take the 4% of total matter as a constant number of universal matter (particles).
Nowadays observations shows that volume of universe is enlarging (stretching).
And the Questions is : What does cause the universe to enlarge and even faster.
As a first assumption for inscreasing enlargement (Redshift) gravity/gravitational force does not work in large scales instead runs only smaller and/or closer scales.
(redshift : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redshift)
If DP started stretching because of the BB (Big Bang) which caused the first momentum of stretching than DP must give the kinetic movement. If it has the kinetic energy than it should be plasma (something like dust and/or cloud but unknown molecular structure). Becasue we can not assume waves (such as neutrino) can not transfer kinetic to another/ interact with each other. Than; the back/bottom/main structure of universe should be in a plasma form (pattern) So We can hope to discover it and measure it.
If we continue this way of thinking than we can reach DP is effecting by all star explosions (supernovas) which means supernova explosions should be added into formula to calculate of its latest state volume which means energy of known matter and stellar explosions passed its main structural energy to force DP enlarging. Enlarging, Strecthing, Explosions must be bilateral (two-way) interacting.
(The top panel shows the evolution in the stellar mass density, solid line with dark-red shaded area) as a function of redshift... http://wwwmpa.mpa-garching.mpg.de/mpa/research/current_research/hl2005-4/hl2005-4-en.html)
Once all matter burned and decay into scattered particles soup as if the very first picture of BB then Dark Plasma will not be effected any propulsive force for stretching. So DP can turn back to its stable state into planck length by collecting all particles by itself.
Force of Stable State of Dark Plasma can pass the barrier to able carry all scattered particles into planck length which may cause another pressure and heat for BB.
Conclusion
Dark Plasma may repeat the same "Pressure - BB - Stretch - Back to Stable State" scenario infinite times. However it shapes the exactly the same structure at each time. So What we need to make it differes from the previous one. It is error constant which has its own error! Which may trigger different status and different shapes of universe at each time but with similar structure of atoms and energy. Another fundamental error about the universe comes from the understanding of quantum field. If we do not take out the "time" variable from the formulas it may impossible to understand the homogenity of the structure of universe. Kinetic movement and waves are the only matter of fact of the energy transfer (as far as we know today). I must say; there is no evidence there is time in universe.
I do assume the Dark Matter is dense form of Dark Plasma. Enormous explotions of stars and/or galaxies collison cause pressure on DP somehow and turns out to dense form for a while.
As a result, super-symmetric-strings may be taken as a basis of Dark Plasma Hypothesis which may explain the lost of anti-matter after the very beginning explosion (BB).
The first BB kinetic force and continued supernova kinetics are giving the shape to universe like the form below figure. Not a sphere or elliptical but dynamic form.
As a last assumption because of super-symmetric-strings there should be two universes, one matter and one anti-matter with the same universal plasma.
Required tests to able to reach the proof.
1. 99 to 130 Tev anregend as a stimulus electrons collision at LHC. However vacuum should have ionosphere specs.
2. 19 to ? Tev electrons collision at LHC while uranium235 and/or plutonium 239 fission explotion.
Results will give us an understanding of plasma behaviour.
We need to understand why and how dark enery/matter behave as if a airbag between while two galaxies are colliding.
Referenses
Evolution and Nucleosynthesis in Low-Mass Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars. II. Neutron Capture and the s-Processhttp://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1086/305437/meta
Thermal pulses; p-capture, alpha-capture, s-process nucleosynthesis; and convective mixing in a star of intermediate mass
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1975ApJ...196..525I
Pre-big-bang in string cosmologyhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0927650593900178
Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis Revisited
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1973ApJ...179..343W
Big bang nucleosynthesis - Theories and observations
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1985ARA%26A..23..319B
However the missing part of the BB Hypothesis is the root cause of the pressure.
Where did the pressure come from? Or How pressure happened?
I think Dark Plasma Hypothesis will give some light on the root cause of pressure and the circle of universal dynamics.
Hypothesis
We know today, 4% are known matter and particles and 96% of universe is unknown Dark Energy and Dark Matter. I will ignore Dark Matter for now and focus on Dark Energy. All energy forms as far as We know should have a source in itself OR outer source. But we don't know what dark energy is! To able to make easier to be understand of the model than I will take it as a plasma in this hypothesis and call the Dark Energy as "Dark Plasma" (in short DP).
As we know all isotopes has its own stable state. If we take Dark Plasma's stable state is to be planck length then it will incline back to its first status which was the first state of BB. However BB caused to enlarge the DP. (Please think DP as a stretched fabric or stretch liquid which covers all matter OR all particles swim inside of it).
Nowadays observations shows that volume of universe is enlarging (stretching).
And the Questions is : What does cause the universe to enlarge and even faster.
As a first assumption for inscreasing enlargement (Redshift) gravity/gravitational force does not work in large scales instead runs only smaller and/or closer scales.
(redshift : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redshift)
If DP started stretching because of the BB (Big Bang) which caused the first momentum of stretching than DP must give the kinetic movement. If it has the kinetic energy than it should be plasma (something like dust and/or cloud but unknown molecular structure). Becasue we can not assume waves (such as neutrino) can not transfer kinetic to another/ interact with each other. Than; the back/bottom/main structure of universe should be in a plasma form (pattern) So We can hope to discover it and measure it.
If we continue this way of thinking than we can reach DP is effecting by all star explosions (supernovas) which means supernova explosions should be added into formula to calculate of its latest state volume which means energy of known matter and stellar explosions passed its main structural energy to force DP enlarging. Enlarging, Strecthing, Explosions must be bilateral (two-way) interacting.
Once all matter burned and decay into scattered particles soup as if the very first picture of BB then Dark Plasma will not be effected any propulsive force for stretching. So DP can turn back to its stable state into planck length by collecting all particles by itself.
Force of Stable State of Dark Plasma can pass the barrier to able carry all scattered particles into planck length which may cause another pressure and heat for BB.
Conclusion
Dark Plasma may repeat the same "Pressure - BB - Stretch - Back to Stable State" scenario infinite times. However it shapes the exactly the same structure at each time. So What we need to make it differes from the previous one. It is error constant which has its own error! Which may trigger different status and different shapes of universe at each time but with similar structure of atoms and energy. Another fundamental error about the universe comes from the understanding of quantum field. If we do not take out the "time" variable from the formulas it may impossible to understand the homogenity of the structure of universe. Kinetic movement and waves are the only matter of fact of the energy transfer (as far as we know today). I must say; there is no evidence there is time in universe.
I do assume the Dark Matter is dense form of Dark Plasma. Enormous explotions of stars and/or galaxies collison cause pressure on DP somehow and turns out to dense form for a while.
As a result, super-symmetric-strings may be taken as a basis of Dark Plasma Hypothesis which may explain the lost of anti-matter after the very beginning explosion (BB).
The first BB kinetic force and continued supernova kinetics are giving the shape to universe like the form below figure. Not a sphere or elliptical but dynamic form.
Required tests to able to reach the proof.
1. 99 to 130 Tev anregend as a stimulus electrons collision at LHC. However vacuum should have ionosphere specs.
2. 19 to ? Tev electrons collision at LHC while uranium235 and/or plutonium 239 fission explotion.
Results will give us an understanding of plasma behaviour.
We need to understand why and how dark enery/matter behave as if a airbag between while two galaxies are colliding.
Referenses
Evolution and Nucleosynthesis in Low-Mass Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars. II. Neutron Capture and the s-Processhttp://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1086/305437/meta
Thermal pulses; p-capture, alpha-capture, s-process nucleosynthesis; and convective mixing in a star of intermediate mass
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1975ApJ...196..525I
Pre-big-bang in string cosmologyhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0927650593900178
Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis Revisited
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1973ApJ...179..343W
Big bang nucleosynthesis - Theories and observations
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1985ARA%26A..23..319B
No comments:
Post a Comment