Particule Physics

Einstein had brought relativity, energy-matter equation and gravity waves however real revolution had come with Quantum Mechanics into Physics by Louis De Broglie, Shrödinger, Heisenberg, Max Born, Pascual Jordan, John Von Neumann and others. Thus, we started to understand the particule world which is the main structure of matter and universe.

In 2012 the last particule "Higgs-Boson" has been discovered in Cern. If you look at closer and closer into particules than you will see just vibrating energy strings rather than matter. Which means, matter requires a stable and zero spin particule to able to have a shape. That stable (frozen and zero spin) particule is Higgs Boson.

Well, this explains very enough how matter get a shape and mass. However again if you look closer enough than you will see gaps among the scene of particule shapes in space and time like an old movie as if slow motion.

So the new questions are

•  What is/are filling the gaps? 
•  Is it stable shaping what we see OR Are we missing something? If not than matter can have a shape any place in space and time. So it was not possible to identify!
• What will be the next step? If it is to collide electron and positron to understand the main picture than how can we know will e- & e+ will behave as a particule Or wave while colliding, according to Shrödinger and Heisenberg equations. And Where will e- & e+  be ?
• Will it be possible to build a tube with a diameter (2.817x10^–15)  +1 at the end of the collider to able to match e- & e+ in terms of Technological perspective?

I am pretty sure, many more questions will be arised by Theoritical Physicists while keeping supersymmetry on the other pocket.

On the other hand I have alternative idea about black holes which was causing tiring effort almost a centurty for many scientiests. Theory about black holes had been created based on the gravity bends the light (photon). After the first theory many scientiests tried to create alternative however similar theories. Only Bekenstein had brought consistent explanation by using entropy (second law of  thermodynamics) after Bekenstein, Hawking followed his foot steps.

You will remember Nasa announced a photo 4th Nov 2015 " NASA just saw something come out of a black hole for the first time ever" http://www.blastr.com/2015-11-4/nasa-just-saw-something-come-out-black-hole-first-time-ever

However after worked on the photo I would like to say that : We know black holes bends the light which is the main evidence the theory standing on. We also know dark matter bends the light and we see the back scene of the dark matter 3D echo of light in front of the dark matter. So I think that black holes are not holes instead it is dark matter just we see as a dark spot in the universe. So we see an illusion in the photo (escaping from black hole). I think something was passing behind of dark matter and we see 3D echo of light as if it is escaping from dark spot. On the other hand, if we ommit black holes than the universe explanations will be more accurate in terms of QM. 

At the end, we have two mysterious things on the hand which are Dark Matter and Dark Energy, also some more experiments for the mass equations & higgs field.