Particule Physics

Einstein had brought relativity, energy-matter equation and gravity waves however real revolution had come with Quantum Mechanics into Physics by Louis De Broglie, Shrödinger, Heisenberg, Max Born, Pascual Jordan, John Von Neumann and others. Thus, we started to understand the particule world which is the main structure of matter and universe.

In 2012 the last particule "Higgs-Boson" has been discovered in Cern. If you look at closer and closer into particules than you will see just vibrating energy strings rather than matter. Which means, matter requires a stable and zero spin particule to able to have a shape. That stable (frozen and zero spin) particule is Higgs Boson.

Well, this explains very enough how matter get a shape and mass. However again if you look closer enough than you will see gaps among the scene of particule shapes in space and time like an old movie as if slow motion.

So the new questions are

•  What is/are filling the gaps? 
•  Is it stable shaping what we see OR Are we missing something? If not than matter can have a shape any place in space and time. So it was not possible to identify!
• What will be the next step? If it is to collide electron and positron to understand the main picture than how can we know will e- & e+ will behave as a particule Or wave while colliding, according to Shrödinger and Heisenberg equations. And Where will e- & e+  be ?
• Will it be possible to build a tube with a diameter (2.817x10^–15)  +1 at the end of the collider to able to match e- & e+ in terms of Technological perspective?

I am pretty sure, many more questions will be arised by Theoritical Physicists while keeping supersymmetry on the other pocket.

On the other hand I have alternative idea about black holes which was causing tiring effort almost a centurty for many scientiests. Theory about black holes had been created based on the gravity bends the light (photon). After the first theory many scientiests tried to create alternative however similar theories. Only Bekenstein had brought consistent explanation by using entropy (second law of  thermodynamics) after Bekenstein, Hawking followed his foot steps.

You will remember Nasa announced a photo 4th Nov 2015 " NASA just saw something come out of a black hole for the first time ever" http://www.blastr.com/2015-11-4/nasa-just-saw-something-come-out-black-hole-first-time-ever

However after worked on the photo I would like to say that : We know black holes bends the light which is the main evidence the theory standing on. We also know dark matter bends the light and we see the back scene of the dark matter 3D echo of light in front of the dark matter. So I think that black holes are not holes instead it is dark matter just we see as a dark spot in the universe. So we see an illusion in the photo (escaping from black hole). I think something was passing behind of dark matter and we see 3D echo of light as if it is escaping from dark spot. On the other hand, if we ommit black holes than the universe explanations will be more accurate in terms of QM. 

At the end, we have two mysterious things on the hand which are Dark Matter and Dark Energy, also some more experiments for the mass equations & higgs field.

Bildiğimiz fiziğin sınırlarına ulaştık

"Bilinen partikül fiziğinin (kuantum mekanik) yasaları ile bulunabilecek en son partikül 4 Temmuz 2012 yılında bulunması ile son bulmuştur." Bu fikre karşı çıkanlar olduğu kadar benimsenmeye başlanan ana fikrin bu olduğu düşüncesi ortak görünüyor. Japon bilim adamları, daha spesifik noktada elektron-pozitron çarpıştırma deneylerinin daha net sonuçlar vereceği görüşünde olmalarına karşın, teknolojik olarak böyle bir cihazın yapılabilmesi pratikte mümkün ile imkansız arasında bir noktada duruyor.

İki çok kritik rakam arasındaki bir yaşamı paylaşıyoruz.
Higgs alanı ile Dark (henüz bir adı olmayan) enerji dengesi arasında bir noktada var olmaya devam ediyoruz. Öyle bir güçler dengesi ki, bu denge çok çok küçük bir miktar dark enerji tarafında olmuş olsaydı; bildiğimiz hiçbir madde, yıldız, gezen, galaksi ve hatta bizler var olamazdık. Bugünün matematiği bu olasılığı hesaplamaya yeterli değil. Belki de gelecekte yeni keşfedeceklerimiz tüm matematiği ve fiziği yeniden yazmamıza neden olacak ya da belki kendimizi tam bir çözümsüzlüğün içinde bulacağız. Araştırmaya ve denemeye devam etmekten başka bir yol görünmüyor.

Elimizde kalan son olasılık ise, süpersimetri ve belki de 2016 yılı içinde enerjiyi iki katına çıkararak yapılacak deney; ya da eğer enerji seviyesi kanıtlara ulaşmak için yeterli olmazsa; daha sonraki yıllarda enerji seviyesi arttırılarak yenilenecek olan deneyler sayesinde süpersimetri'ye dair bir ip ucu elde edilmesi olasılığı halen bir umut ışığı olarak görülüyor.

Linkler ile ilgili detayları aşağıda bulabilir, okuyabilirsiniz.

Sevgiler.

Supersymmetry predicts a partner particle for each particle in the Standard Model, to help explain why particles have masshttp://home.cern/about/physics/supersymmetry


Harry Cliff: Have we reached the end of physics?https://www.ted.com/talks/harry_cliff_have_we_reached_the_end_of_physics

Why is there something rather than nothing? Why does so much interesting stuff exist in the universe? Particle physicist Harry Cliff works on the Large Hadron Collider at CERN, and he has some potentially bad news for people who seek answers to these questions. Despite the best efforts of scientists (and the help of the biggest machine on the planet), we may never be able to explain all the weird features of nature. Is this the end of physics? Learn more in this fascinating talk about the latest research into the secret structure of the universe.

CERN : Bigger than the Higgs, bigger even than gravitational waves…

http://www.tatsrevolution.com/2016/03/03/cern-bigger-than-the-higgs-bigger-even-than-gravitational-waves/

“We may be entering a new era in physics. An era where there are weird features in the Universe that we cannot explain. An era where we have hints that we live in a multiverse that lies frustratingly beyond our reach. An era where we will never be able to answer the question why is there something rather than nothing.”