* Antihydrogen and hydrogen are similar in spectrum results. Well, when antimatter and matter collides creates another particle + energy. However it is invisible to eyes. So this creates another question. Why dark matter & dark energy should be different?
At the very beginning there were tons of collisions. Some of them may be create matter and some of them antimatter. Matter and antimatter collisions might be create another particle and energy. Dark! Because we can not see with telescopes and can not observe.
Dark means who knows. Dark means we can not observe. Dark means we can not test. Dark is a funny terms in physics.
OK. Let’s turn to reality. Observers have observed 2 things and put predictions for it. Galaxies are rotating faster than expected. Also red shift says galaxies are getting far from each other and universe is expanding faster than expected. So what were the predictions? Dark matter triggers galaxies rotate faster. Dark energy triggers the expansion. So what did they do? We have 2 unexpected reality so they have put 2 unknown variables into formula. Well, what do they expect? Now they expect to solve 2 unknown variables instead of 2 unexpected phenomenon. This is not a brilliant way to solve the problem. Isn’t it? Well, new observations showed some galaxies have no enough gaps for dark matter. This caused impact on the predictions. No, I can not say the solution but I can say 2 options. Predictions are may be incorrect. Observers should create more sensitive telescopes. If predictions are incorrect than some formulas are incorrect. If formulas are incorrect than some models are incorrect. If model is incorrect than start from scratch.
Also I can put 2 optinal hypothesis. Let's forget blackholes for a minute because I think blackholes are whirls in space and those are not stable and infinite. Well,
1. If there is no big bang and all galaxies are in a orbit around the center of universe than you may observe they are getting far from each other depends on our lifetime. Because our lifetime is not long enough to observe whole orbiting movement. But We observe similar red shift according to the orbit of each galaxy. You may understand this system as self feeding and infinite.(We are all authority-centered thinking creatures which cause to think there should be starting point and all others should follow or orbit around a massive something. But may be orbits of all galaxies are jut angular momentum orbits. The center of universe is a virtual center and may change according to angular momentum of vortex orbit of billions of galaxies in a long long process.)
2. If big bang had really happpened and if there is no center of universe than each galaxy may break magnetic buble force (in other words in daily language: gravity)of other galaxies which makes galaxies are getting faster once magnetic bubles force effect getting less depends on velocity of galaxies and distance among them. However superconductivity should be added into electromagnetic power theory of gravity to reach full understanding. Thus we can observe that universe is expanding and getting faster according to red shift.
* The question is why quantum world vs normal matter world should be different? Is it just a perception of us? Well, gravity! Electrons(fermions) orbit around the nucleus (not fully correct but different energy states of fermions around the nucleus). Earth orbit around the sun (not fully correct but vortex orbit. May be we can it different energy states of earth around the sun). Why should different physics work among those examples? What kind of energy keep electron in the orbit of nucleus? So what kind of energy keep the earth in the orbit of sun? Another question. Electrons has two states. Matter and wave. Earth? Well, electron & positron collides and w boson produces. Why should it be different in normal matter world? What cause us to think all those are different? 3 quarks + gluon creates an atom in short explanation. OK. What are all normal matter world made from? * Why Albert Einstein had refused & deprecated Quantum Mechanics? Some says He had never understood QM. I think he had understood perfectly that QM would have explained truths which might be destroyed his science fiction world who sown into science mind. Can’t you understand? e is faster than c in Cerenkov radiation. What does it mean? C is not the top limit. Second, e= mc2 fails again. Also you may aware about the CERN Opera detector experiment about neutrino. The result was "The Neutrino Anormaly" because results were showing that neutrinos were faster than light. Observers had found the results shocking because they were under the ridiciculus influence of Einstein's physics in wonderland. So this bias shocked observers and now they are searching "errors" in the experiment and detectors.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Yk5LrJnuXw&t=29s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZFz3fJMJ-yA&t=54s How many times Einstein’s wonderland should fail to let you understand and let you turn to reality? There is no real time. Time is a measurement unit like meter, kg. There is no speed of light limit. There is no space&time fabric. E=mc2 does not work. General Relativity is not law of physics but a shiny useless product had been marketed to naive scientists. You may understand Albert Einstein = Sigmund Freud. Both put useless & ridiculus wonderland into science world. However Psychology was lucky because they understood that Freud laws were ridiculus and rejected from Psychology decades ago. However physics is not lucky enough so physicist should only understand after many decades and test results. Only after that point they will reject Einstein's wonderland and clean the Physics from ridiculus bias (hopefully). * Mind blowing Question : The hardest thing is observing& identifying in physics. If you observe the movements of objects than it is easy relatively.But if you observe yourself? For example if you are looking at yourself in the mirror;in fact it takes nano secs the mirror to reflect you. So are you there? Or you were there? Who is observing if you have passed away? Light reflects from the mirror + you see (observe) + identify (you realize the reflection when it arrives to the brain. There are several operations in the brain)= total process! * What was there before big bang? This question is not only physics but it is basically archeology of astronomy. * @NASA @esa @esascience @Harvard @BillNye Please teach people and remember me as Mr. Time when I am gone. Let me explain what is time? Any molecule component should be decomposed when lost its own energy if any other decomposition process has not been happened. That molecule component is you. Each move you take gives infinite possibilities and stand in front of you. You chose one and move. Always you learn and have a reason choose one of those possibilities. Once you have chosen one than others disappear. Sometimes you choose a painfull path. You learn fear and pain which leads you to choose boring but safety path. So you start to choose same boring path everyday. Meanwhile you remember the paths you walk. Because your brain records every step you have taken. This is your past. Once you realize all of your movements than you describe it as time. This is time. So asking qustion “is time real?” is like asking “is mile real?” Or “is litre real?” Those are all rulers we use in our daily lives and science😊
* Ridiculus Questions:
What are the evidences of BB? GN-Z11 red shift and gravitional waves from the beginning.
1. gn-z11 has been observed and can’t observe beyond that isn’t it the proof of radius of universe has ever been observed. Red shift says kinetic and angular momentum still works.
2. Gravitional waves says there is or there was magnetic buble almost 13.7 billion light years away. It does not make sense for the BB. Because it says there were huge objects to able create magnetic buble waves.
3. If BB is correct than why CMB is elliptic? Shouldn’t it be spherical?
Homo sapiens mind can not imagine and understand infinity. Human has never required to identify infinity in shaped and finite world to feed itself/invent/move etc.to live. So brain development and brain evolution has never needed to understand infinity. Anyway; From quantum world to astronomical world all are orbiting. So why we don’t think galaxies are orbiting instead of BB & linear kinetics to nowhere?
As last question. Why we don’t think the universe is self-feeding galactic ecosystem? So all can focus on the system we live in and the actual problems in solar system and earth... we know very less yet.
* Why do some people believe predictions (hypothesis + unproved theories) are the laws of physics? I think the main reason is education and bias of teachers. Quantum Field is a theory not a law of physics. Physics need ideas to figure out some actual problems but sometimes those ideas create more complex problems. I think all you know Heisenberg’s experiment about electrons. The result was unexpected. So Heisenberg’s uncertainity principle had come. Well, others tried to explain it with Quantum Field Theory which is a theoretical framework that combines classical field theory and quantum mechanics and is used to construct physical models of subatomic particles and quasiparticles.
However laws of physics are determined once tests results proved (in sigma 6).
Also you need to understand deeply that physics is not a social science which does not work according to perception of human being. Reality and perception are not the same or not even similar.
* If I was a dreamer than probably I could say "Our consciousness and memories are recorded at Quantum Field as a pattern & it might be accessible millions after we are all died".
And billions years after solar system died, our genetic foot print may born on a different planet of a different star, somewhere in the universe. So our memories could be written back to our minds if there is a correlation between quantum field pattern and genetic code.
But I can not imagine it...
* We know our telecommunication system does not work fast enough in large scale. If we would like to keen for Mars than we should find another solution. Todays tech is like a smoke communication. Neutrino is a possibility. So physicists should focus on a new communicaiton
@NASA
* Question. Why space probes do not use oxygen crystals? It covers less space but much more amount than liquid. It can be injected to fire place and a small amount of solar panel electricity might be ignited. It absorbs oxygen 160 times greater than gas form.
@NASA
OK. Let’s turn to reality. Observers have observed 2 things and put predictions for it. Galaxies are rotating faster than expected. Also red shift says galaxies are getting far from each other and universe is expanding faster than expected. So what were the predictions? Dark matter triggers galaxies rotate faster. Dark energy triggers the expansion. So what did they do? We have 2 unexpected reality so they have put 2 unknown variables into formula. Well, what do they expect? Now they expect to solve 2 unknown variables instead of 2 unexpected phenomenon. This is not a brilliant way to solve the problem. Isn’t it? Well, new observations showed some galaxies have no enough gaps for dark matter. This caused impact on the predictions. No, I can not say the solution but I can say 2 options. Predictions are may be incorrect. Observers should create more sensitive telescopes. If predictions are incorrect than some formulas are incorrect. If formulas are incorrect than some models are incorrect. If model is incorrect than start from scratch.
Also I can put 2 optinal hypothesis. Let's forget blackholes for a minute because I think blackholes are whirls in space and those are not stable and infinite. Well,
1. If there is no big bang and all galaxies are in a orbit around the center of universe than you may observe they are getting far from each other depends on our lifetime. Because our lifetime is not long enough to observe whole orbiting movement. But We observe similar red shift according to the orbit of each galaxy. You may understand this system as self feeding and infinite.(We are all authority-centered thinking creatures which cause to think there should be starting point and all others should follow or orbit around a massive something. But may be orbits of all galaxies are jut angular momentum orbits. The center of universe is a virtual center and may change according to angular momentum of vortex orbit of billions of galaxies in a long long process.)
2. If big bang had really happpened and if there is no center of universe than each galaxy may break magnetic buble force (in other words in daily language: gravity)of other galaxies which makes galaxies are getting faster once magnetic bubles force effect getting less depends on velocity of galaxies and distance among them. However superconductivity should be added into electromagnetic power theory of gravity to reach full understanding. Thus we can observe that universe is expanding and getting faster according to red shift.
* The question is why quantum world vs normal matter world should be different? Is it just a perception of us? Well, gravity! Electrons(fermions) orbit around the nucleus (not fully correct but different energy states of fermions around the nucleus). Earth orbit around the sun (not fully correct but vortex orbit. May be we can it different energy states of earth around the sun). Why should different physics work among those examples? What kind of energy keep electron in the orbit of nucleus? So what kind of energy keep the earth in the orbit of sun? Another question. Electrons has two states. Matter and wave. Earth? Well, electron & positron collides and w boson produces. Why should it be different in normal matter world? What cause us to think all those are different? 3 quarks + gluon creates an atom in short explanation. OK. What are all normal matter world made from? * Why Albert Einstein had refused & deprecated Quantum Mechanics? Some says He had never understood QM. I think he had understood perfectly that QM would have explained truths which might be destroyed his science fiction world who sown into science mind. Can’t you understand? e is faster than c in Cerenkov radiation. What does it mean? C is not the top limit. Second, e= mc2 fails again. Also you may aware about the CERN Opera detector experiment about neutrino. The result was "The Neutrino Anormaly" because results were showing that neutrinos were faster than light. Observers had found the results shocking because they were under the ridiciculus influence of Einstein's physics in wonderland. So this bias shocked observers and now they are searching "errors" in the experiment and detectors.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Yk5LrJnuXw&t=29s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZFz3fJMJ-yA&t=54s How many times Einstein’s wonderland should fail to let you understand and let you turn to reality? There is no real time. Time is a measurement unit like meter, kg. There is no speed of light limit. There is no space&time fabric. E=mc2 does not work. General Relativity is not law of physics but a shiny useless product had been marketed to naive scientists. You may understand Albert Einstein = Sigmund Freud. Both put useless & ridiculus wonderland into science world. However Psychology was lucky because they understood that Freud laws were ridiculus and rejected from Psychology decades ago. However physics is not lucky enough so physicist should only understand after many decades and test results. Only after that point they will reject Einstein's wonderland and clean the Physics from ridiculus bias (hopefully). * Mind blowing Question : The hardest thing is observing& identifying in physics. If you observe the movements of objects than it is easy relatively.But if you observe yourself? For example if you are looking at yourself in the mirror;in fact it takes nano secs the mirror to reflect you. So are you there? Or you were there? Who is observing if you have passed away? Light reflects from the mirror + you see (observe) + identify (you realize the reflection when it arrives to the brain. There are several operations in the brain)= total process! * What was there before big bang? This question is not only physics but it is basically archeology of astronomy. * @NASA @esa @esascience @Harvard @BillNye Please teach people and remember me as Mr. Time when I am gone. Let me explain what is time? Any molecule component should be decomposed when lost its own energy if any other decomposition process has not been happened. That molecule component is you. Each move you take gives infinite possibilities and stand in front of you. You chose one and move. Always you learn and have a reason choose one of those possibilities. Once you have chosen one than others disappear. Sometimes you choose a painfull path. You learn fear and pain which leads you to choose boring but safety path. So you start to choose same boring path everyday. Meanwhile you remember the paths you walk. Because your brain records every step you have taken. This is your past. Once you realize all of your movements than you describe it as time. This is time. So asking qustion “is time real?” is like asking “is mile real?” Or “is litre real?” Those are all rulers we use in our daily lives and science😊
* Ridiculus Questions:
What are the evidences of BB? GN-Z11 red shift and gravitional waves from the beginning.
1. gn-z11 has been observed and can’t observe beyond that isn’t it the proof of radius of universe has ever been observed. Red shift says kinetic and angular momentum still works.
2. Gravitional waves says there is or there was magnetic buble almost 13.7 billion light years away. It does not make sense for the BB. Because it says there were huge objects to able create magnetic buble waves.
3. If BB is correct than why CMB is elliptic? Shouldn’t it be spherical?
Homo sapiens mind can not imagine and understand infinity. Human has never required to identify infinity in shaped and finite world to feed itself/invent/move etc.to live. So brain development and brain evolution has never needed to understand infinity. Anyway; From quantum world to astronomical world all are orbiting. So why we don’t think galaxies are orbiting instead of BB & linear kinetics to nowhere?
As last question. Why we don’t think the universe is self-feeding galactic ecosystem? So all can focus on the system we live in and the actual problems in solar system and earth... we know very less yet.
* Why do some people believe predictions (hypothesis + unproved theories) are the laws of physics? I think the main reason is education and bias of teachers. Quantum Field is a theory not a law of physics. Physics need ideas to figure out some actual problems but sometimes those ideas create more complex problems. I think all you know Heisenberg’s experiment about electrons. The result was unexpected. So Heisenberg’s uncertainity principle had come. Well, others tried to explain it with Quantum Field Theory which is a theoretical framework that combines classical field theory and quantum mechanics and is used to construct physical models of subatomic particles and quasiparticles.
However laws of physics are determined once tests results proved (in sigma 6).
Also you need to understand deeply that physics is not a social science which does not work according to perception of human being. Reality and perception are not the same or not even similar.
* If I was a dreamer than probably I could say "Our consciousness and memories are recorded at Quantum Field as a pattern & it might be accessible millions after we are all died".
And billions years after solar system died, our genetic foot print may born on a different planet of a different star, somewhere in the universe. So our memories could be written back to our minds if there is a correlation between quantum field pattern and genetic code.
But I can not imagine it...
* We know our telecommunication system does not work fast enough in large scale. If we would like to keen for Mars than we should find another solution. Todays tech is like a smoke communication. Neutrino is a possibility. So physicists should focus on a new communicaiton
@NASA
* Again. If there is no scientific facts than man creates hypothesis and even hyper-fart-hypothesis which helps him to believe. In psychological point of view belief helps him to accept to be a mortal. Otherwise he can not find meaning in the life.
Whereas it is ridiculus to load extra meaning to life but he can not stand without meanings, love, heaven and hell because he thinks he is the most important and a great species.
This is the main problematic aspect he has ever believed.
But science is nominative and speaks only facts which has been proved min.sigma 6 and recursive. Science tells him who is not the most important compound on earth or in universe which makes him unhappy so he holds fairytales as strong as he can.
As a conclusion life is a miracle and magnificent beauty but he is the only one tiny and short part of it.
No comments:
Post a Comment