Thursday 13 February 2020

Questions


Questions

What we know about particules in physics?

Quarks, leptons, fermions, hadrons, atoms, molecules, matter etc.
Covalent bond again etc.

Forces




Strong, weak, electromagnetism, gravity...

Once all physicists start to learn than they all accept those forces which mean energy are there naturally. They never think to questionize how that energy is in the atom? Or between quarks? Or in leptons, fermions?

We must ask from nowon. How those energy inserted into atom? Where it comes from? How connect covalent bond? How electron moves? Why it is negative? Why pozitron is positive? And so on..

I started to think that there must a energy space (you know I refuse time parameter, There is only energy and movement up to me) so those particules can interact and get the required energy (I also refuse dark matter and dark energy. All those shit comes from red shift anolmaly and they put another unknown parameters to able to explain two new parameter. I had disccused those in my previous articles)

Whatif we ignore forces? What is the rest? Assume that there is no energy (forces) in quarks, fermions, leptons than how could they be? Higgs boson? However it has no spin! If there is no spin than there is not enough energy in it. So all we know must be higgs boson with no spin! A still universe!

This is weird because it is not the observation. All particules have spins and all objects are in movements. So energy is there obviously. If it is there than where it comes from? Nothing can exist from nothing. If it is so and if particules have spins and bond than that energy must come from somewhere. 

Somewhere can not be nowhere in the middle of universe. All are connected to each other however we call some chaos because we are not ready yet to understand all parameters and pattern. Once we understood than chaos will be chaos but it will be law of physics.

The energy in quarks must interact with a layer of energy. We did not observe yet because we don't ask questions. We don't ask questions so we don't look at.

I think it is energy layer of space. That energy must interact with particules and must give the requisite part of energy for spin. Once particules get the required energy than the physics starts we know today.

But I don't believe scientist will ask that question for 100 years. May be after a few centuries some will start to ask and observe.

My lifetime is not enough to wake them up.

PS. Remember e=mc2 comes from patent office clerk who had said quantum mechanics & quantum entanglement is spooky action! Woow what a scientific term! (Sigmund Freud had given science fiction into psychology and Einsten had done the same to physics) Anyway draw your red line and forget that clerk and his platitudes but focus on quantum mechanics. Ask deeper questions.
  

No comments:

Post a Comment